Juan Chales, 30Killed 2/18/07 7:00 am
3700 block of San Leandro St
Stabbing
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Monday, February 5, 2007
"Tragedy"
I hate that word. Not just because it's inherently bad news. It has completely lost its meaning.
As I compile the information on these "tragedies", I find myself looking for patterns & similarities. For example, the last 2 homicide victims were both Black 21 year-olds killed on Feb 3rd by a gun. But such exercises are silly. I'm sure these 2 individuals were completely different and, well, individuals (one was killed by police, the other by a friend). I think the brain tries to look for things to distract it from the reality at hand.
I remember being at a meeting to discuss funding for violence prevention initiatives. There was a high-ranked public official present who said something to the effect of: "When a homicide happens, it shouldn't be a story buried in the paper somewhere. We should respond according to the tragedy that it is".
I remember thinking it sounded nice, but was essentially bullshit. If we really thought these homicides were the tragedies that they are, our grief would lead us to outrage, solidarity, and mobilization. These tragedies have happened too much and for too long. By and large, we've gotten used to them. I'd even say they've become acceptable. Is it because the lives lost are expendable, or is it because mainstream society can afford to continue without doing more about it?
Probably both.
How did it come to this?
The only appropriate social response to this "plague of killing" (as the SF Chronicle calls it), and to the fact that we've all but abandoned our inner cities nationwide, would be a response and investment of Marshall Plan proportions. Nothing short of this will result in any meaningful, significant and sustainable change, nor convey to our underclass the message that Yes, we do care. Until then, poverty and neglect will continue to reap and sow themselves.
As I compile the information on these "tragedies", I find myself looking for patterns & similarities. For example, the last 2 homicide victims were both Black 21 year-olds killed on Feb 3rd by a gun. But such exercises are silly. I'm sure these 2 individuals were completely different and, well, individuals (one was killed by police, the other by a friend). I think the brain tries to look for things to distract it from the reality at hand.
I remember being at a meeting to discuss funding for violence prevention initiatives. There was a high-ranked public official present who said something to the effect of: "When a homicide happens, it shouldn't be a story buried in the paper somewhere. We should respond according to the tragedy that it is".
I remember thinking it sounded nice, but was essentially bullshit. If we really thought these homicides were the tragedies that they are, our grief would lead us to outrage, solidarity, and mobilization. These tragedies have happened too much and for too long. By and large, we've gotten used to them. I'd even say they've become acceptable. Is it because the lives lost are expendable, or is it because mainstream society can afford to continue without doing more about it?
Probably both.
How did it come to this?
The only appropriate social response to this "plague of killing" (as the SF Chronicle calls it), and to the fact that we've all but abandoned our inner cities nationwide, would be a response and investment of Marshall Plan proportions. Nothing short of this will result in any meaningful, significant and sustainable change, nor convey to our underclass the message that Yes, we do care. Until then, poverty and neglect will continue to reap and sow themselves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
